asset pricing anomalies at the firm level

Naderi beni, Rahmat Allah; Arabsalehi, Mehdi; Kazemi, Iraj

[Home ] [Archive]

[ فارسی ]

Main Menu

Home

Journal Information

Articles archive

For Authors

For Reviewers

Registration

Contact us

Site Facilities

Search in website

Receive site information

year 11, Issue 42 (2019)

fa 2019, 11(42): 52-74

Back to browse issues page

asset pricing anomalies at the firm level

Rahmat Allah Naderi beni¹

, Mehdi Arabsalehi ^*

¹, Iraj Kazemi¹

1- Isfahan university

Abstract: (1998 Views)

Anomaly is deviation from common rules and in finance it can be defined as a pattern in the average of stock return that is not consistent with the prevailing asset pricing models literature. For anomaly investigation two common methods are used: portfolio approach and individual firm approach. This paper wants to shed light on anomalies of capital asset pricing model at the individual firm level. This approach is used because of portfolio approach deficiencies. The sample consists of 1150 firm – year observations in Tehran stock exchange in the period of 1387-1396. Bayesian approach and standard Markov chain Monte Carlo have been used to test hypothesis. The results show that the variables which consist of size, book value to market value, momentum, profitability, asset growth, working capital accrual items, financial distress, investments, net stock issuance and external financing cannot be interpreted as anomaly when the test is at the individual firm level.
Keywords: Anomaly, Hierarchical Bayesian, Capital Asset Pricing Model

Keywords: Anomaly, Hierarchical Bayesian, Capital Asset Pricing Model

Full-Text [PDF 1281 kb] (642 Downloads)

Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special

References

1. Ang, Andrew, Jun Liu, and Krista Schwarz. (2010). "Using stocks or portfolios in tests of factor models".Working paper, Columbia University.

2. Ariss, R. T., R. R., &, S. M. M. (2011). "Calendar anomalies in the Gulf Cooperation Council stock markets". Emerging Markets Review, 12, 293-307.

3. Avramov, D., T. C., G. J., &, A. P. (2013). Anomalies and financial distress. Journal of Financial Economics, 108, 139-159.

4. Banz, R. (1981). "The relationship between return and market value of common stock". Journal of Financial Economics, 9, 3-18

5. Basu, S. (1983). "The relationship between earnings ‘yield, market value and return for NYSE common stocks". Journal of Financial Economics, 12,129-156

6. Bekhradinasab, V, Zoolanghad, F. (2018). “The effect of earning quality earning on the relationship between momentum and excess return”. Financial Engineering and Securities Management, 8, 32, 21-43. (In Persian)

7. Białkowski, J., M. T. B., P. K., &, T. P. W. (2013). Do mutual fund managers exploit the Ramadan anomaly? Evidence from Turkey. Emerging Markets Review, 211-225.

8. Blum, Marshal. (1970). Portfolio theory: A Step Towards its Practical Application. Journal of Business. 43 (2), 152-174.

9. Campbell, John. Lo, Andrew. Mackinlay. (1998). the Econometrics of Financial Market. Pronsto university press

10. Cederburg, Scott and Micheal, M. Doherty. (2015). Asset-pricing anomalies at the firm level. Journal of Econometrics, 186, 113-128.

11. Chou, P.-H., P.-H. H., &, K.-C. K. (2012). Do industries matter in explaining stock returns and asset-pricing anomalies? Journal of Banking & Finance, 36, 355-369.

12. Cochrane, John H., 2011, Presidential Address: Discount Rates, Journal of Finance 66, 10, 47-1108.

13. De Bondt Werner F. M and Richard Thaler. (1985). Does the Stock Market Overreact? The Journal of Finance, 4(3), 793-805

14. Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work. (1970). Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417.

15. Fama, E . F., and Kenneth R. French. (2008). Dissecting anomalies, Journal of Finance, 63, 1653–1678.

16. Harvey Campbell, Liu Yan and Zhu Heqing (2016). …And the Cross Section Of Expected Return, Journal of Finance, 71, 1, 5 – 32

17. Hornby, S. (2015). Oxsord Advanced Learniner’s Dictionary. Oxford University Press, Fifth Edition.

18. Kandel, Shmuel, Robert McCulloch, and Robert F. Stambaugh, (1995). Bayesian inference and portfolio eﬃciency, Review of Financial Studies, 8, 1–53.

19. Karbalaee,M, Shahveisi, F, Ivani, F. (2016). “The effect of firm growth on the relationship between discretionary accrual with stock return”. Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting, 13, 52, 75-110.

20. Lewellen, Jonathan, and Stefan Nagel. (2010). the conditional CAPM does not explain asset-pricing anomalies, Journal of Financial Economics 82, 289–314.

21. Li, Dogmei., & , Lu. Zhang. (2010). Does q -theory with investment frictions explain anomalies in the cross section of returns? Journal of Financial Economics 98, 297-314.

22. Litzenberger, Robert H., and Krishna Ramaswamy. (1979). the eﬀect of personal taxes and dividends on capital asset prices: Theory and empirical evidence, Journal of Financial Economics, 7, 163–195.

23. Penman, S. H., & Zhu, J. L. (2014). Accounting Anomalies, Risk, and Return. The Accounting Review, 89, 183–196.

24. Richardson, Scott, I., &, P. W. (2010). Accounting anomalies and fundamental analysis: A review of recent research advances. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50, 410-454.

25. Rosenberg, Barr, Kenneth Reid, and Ronald Lanstein, (1985). Persuasive evidence of market ineﬃciency, Journal of Portfolio Management, 11, 9–17.

26. Roll, Richard, (1977). A critique of the asset pricing theory’s tests – Part I: On past and potential testability of the theory, Journal of Financial Economics, 4, 129–176.

27. Sloan, Richard G (1996). Do stock prices fully reflect information in Accruals and Cash Flows about Future Earnings? The Accounting Review, 71, 289–315

28. Summers, B., & Duxbury, D. (2012). Decision-dependent emotions and behavioral anomalies. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 118, 226-238.

29. Watts, Ross L. and Jerold L., Zimmerman. (1986). Positive Accounting Theory. United States of America, Prentice Hall, INC., Englewood cliffs.

Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Naderi beni R A, Arabsalehi M, Kazemi I. asset pricing anomalies at the firm level. fa 2019; 11 (42) :52-74
URL: http://qfaj.mobarakeh.iau.ir/article-1-1764-en.html

Rights and permissions
	This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

year 11, Issue 42 (2019)

Back to browse issues page

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4679