[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: year 18, Issue 69 (2026) ::
fa 2026, 18(69): 1-16 Back to browse issues page
Employee Quality and Cost of Equity Capital
Seyed Mohammad Amin Fattahi1 , Yasser Rezaei Pitenoei *1 , Seyed Mohammad Moshashaei1
1- Department of Accounting, Faculty of Management and Economics, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran.
Abstract:   (249 Views)
 Employees play a crucial role in corporate operations and are considered among the most valuable assets of companies. It is anticipated that employees with higher education levels exhibit greater efficiency and better performance within firms, making them a key factor in reducing the cost of equity capital and gaining investor trust. Accordingly, the present study aims to examine the relationship between employee quality and the cost of equity capital in companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange during the years 2019 to 2023. To measure employee quality, two criteria were used: the weighted average level of education and the proportion of employees holding a bachelor’s degree or higher. To assess the cost of equity capital, the estimated cost of equity using the rPEG  and rMPEG  models was employed. The selected sample consists of 112 companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. The hypotheses were tested using a multivariate regression model based on panel data techniques. The results indicate a significant negative relationship between employee education (measured by both the weighted average level of education and the proportion of employees with a bachelor’s degree or higher) and the cost of equity capital. In other words, employee education plays an important role in reducing the cost of equity capital for companies; thus, the research hypothesis is confirmed. According to the findings, companies employing human resources with higher education levels (bachelor’s degree and above) benefit from lower operational risk, higher operational efficiency, greater information transparency, and higher levels of disclosure compared to other firms. Consequently, they are more successful in reducing investor risk and strengthening market trust. Unlike previous studies, which primarily examined the relationship between employees’ educational levels and performance criteria, this study tests the effect of two novel employee quality measures and two cost of equity estimation models within an integrated framework, while controlling for year and industry effects. The findings have critical implications for managers and policymakers, investing in employee education is not a social cost but a strategic financial tool to reduce financing costs. For investors, employee education level should be considered a risk-reducing and transparency-enhancing signal in investment decisions.
Article number: 1
Keywords: Employee Quality, Employees Education Level, Cost of Equity Capital, Human Capital.
Full-Text [PDF 573 kb]   (59 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
References
1. Al Frijat, Y.S., A.A. Elamer; M.A. Altawalbeh & M.W. Moustafa. (2025). Beyond technical skills: The strategic importance of accountants’ professional development in enhancing corporate investment efficiency through sustainability reporting. Corporate Social Responsibility & Environmental Management 32(6): 8011-8025.
2. Bae, K.H., J.K. Kang & J. Wang. (2011). Employee treatment and firm leverage: A test of the stakeholder theory of capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics 100(1): 130–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.10.019
3. Baker, T.L., A. Rapp, T. Meyer & R. Mullins. (2014). The role of brand communications on front line service employee beliefs, behaviors, and performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 42(6): 642–657.
4. Becker, G.S. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. University of Chicago Press.
5. Berry, C.M., M.L. Gruys & P.R. Sackett. (2006). Educational attainment as a proxy for cognitive ability in selection: Effects on levels of cognitive ability and adverse impact. Journal of Applied Psychology 91(3): 696–705.
6. Bhatia, A., & A. Kaur. (2024). The influence of information asymmetry on the interaction between voluntary corporate disclosure and cost of equity: Evidence from publicly traded Indian enterprises. International Journal of Law & Management 66(1): 23-43.
7. Bishop, S.M., & P. Glick. (2023). Education and workforce development cost-benefit analysis guidance. Millennium Challenge Corporation.
8. Call, A.C., J.L. Campbell, D.S. Dhaliwal & J.M. Moon Jr. (2017). Employee quality and financial reporting outcomes. Journal of Accounting and Economics 64(1): 123-149.
9. Clarke, T., & S. Gholamshahi. (2018). Developing human capital for knowledge based economies. In: T. Clarke and K. Lee (eds), Innovation in the Asia Pacific. Springer, Singapore.
10. Dakhli, M., & D. De Clercq. (2004). Human capital, social capital, and innovation: A multi-country study. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 16(2): 107–128.
11. Dhaliwal, D., J.S. Judd, M. Serfling & S. Shaikh. (2016). Customer concentration risk and the cost of equity capital. Journal of Accounting and Economics 61(1): 23–48.
12. Doherty, N.A. (2005). Risk management, risk capital, and the cost of capital. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 17(3): 119-123.
13. Dumitrescu, E.I., & C. Hurlin. (2012). Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling 29(4): 1450-1460.
14. Duttagupta, R., & C. Pazarbasioglu. (2021). Miles to go: The future of emerging markets. IMF Finance & Development 58(3).
15. Easton, P.D. (2004). PE ratios, PEG ratios, and estimating the implied expected rate of return on equity capital. The Accounting Review 79(1): 73–95.
16. Edmans, A. (2011). Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices. Journal of Financial Economics 101(3): 621–640.
17. Florina, V. (2009). Opportunity cost of educational human capital investment: Application for the position of beneficiary-investor. Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica 11(2): 744–754.
18. Fu, J., Y. Ji & J. Jing. (2020). Rank and file employee satisfaction and the implied cost of equity capital. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 38(2): 182-210.
19. Glaeser, E.L., & R.E. Saks. (2006). Corruption in America. Journal of Public Economics 90(6–7): 1053–1072.
20. Huaman-Roque, A.J., P. Cuyate-Reque, J. Cueva-Ruesta & F. Cordova-Buiza. (2025). Impact of weighted average cost of capital and profitability on economic value added of firms in the industrial sector. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 18(650): 1-17.
21. Lambert, R., C. Leuz & R.E. Verrecchia. (2007). Accounting information, disclosure, and the cost of capital. Journal of Accounting Research 45(2): 385–420.
22. Li, X., X. Chen, B. Qi & G. Tian. (2020). Employee quality and audit fee: Evidence from China. Accounting & Finance 60(5): 4533–4566. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12664
23. Liu, C., B. Lin & E. Shu. (2017). Employee quality, monitoring environment and internal control. China Journal of Accounting Research 10(1): 51-70.
24. Perera, D., P. Chand & R. Mala. (2025). Financial reporting implications for adopting two-tier accounting standards: International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and IFRS for small- and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Accounting Literature, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAL-01-2025-0044
25. Pratt, S.P. (2002). Cost of capital: Estimation and applications. John Wiley & Sons.
26. Ross, S. (2024). What is the human capital theory and how is it used? Investopedia.
27. Wang, Z., & Z. Yuan. (2024). Employee education level and the cost of equity capital. Finance Research Letters 62: 105181.
28. Wu, Y., & X. Liu. (2009). Human capital and R&D activity: Evidence from Chinese private enterprises. China Economic Quarterly 8(4): 1567–1590.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Fattahi S M A, Rezaei Pitenoei Y, Moshashaei S M. Employee Quality and Cost of Equity Capital. fa 2026; 18 (69) : 1
URL: http://qfaj.mobarakeh.iau.ir/article-1-2916-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
year 18, Issue 69 (2026) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه حسابداری مالی Quarterly Financial Accounting
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.12 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4777