|
1. Backof, A. G., J. M. Thayer, and T. Carpenter. (2014). Auditing complex estimates: Managementprovided evidence and auditors’ consideration of inconsistentevidence.WorkingPaper. 2. Bhattacharjee, S., M. J. Maletta, and K. K. Moreno. (2013). Auditors’ judgment errors when working on multiple tasks and in multiple client environments: A research summary and practice implications. Current Issues in Auditing 7 (1): 1-8. 3. Elliott, W. B., K. M. Rennekamp, and B. J. White. (2014). Does concrete anguage in disclosures increase willingness to invest? Review of Accounting Studies: 1-27. 4. Liberman, N., and Y. Trope. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75 (1): 5-18. 5. Liberman, N., and Y. Trope. (2008). The psychology of transcending the here and now. Science 322 (5905): 1201-1205. 6. Liberman, N., Y. Trope, and C. Wakslak, (2007). Construal level theory and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology 17 (2): 113-117. 7. Lindberg, D. L., and M. J. Maletta. (2003). An examination of memory conjunction errors in multiple client audit environments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 22 (1): 127-141. 8. Lundholm, R. J., R. Rogo, and J. L. Zhang. (2014). restoring the tower of Babel: How foreign firms communicate with U.S. investors. The Accounting Review 89 (4): 1453-1485. 9. Malkoc, S. A., G. Zauberman, and J. R. Bettman. (2010). Unstuck from the concrete: Carryover effects of abstract mindsets in intertemporal preferences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 113 (2): 112-126. 10. McPhee, G. (2014). The effects of tangible rewards, payoff timing, and task type on performance. Working Paper. Florida International University. 11. O’Donnell, E., and J. J. Schultz, Jr. (2005). The halo effect in business risk audits: Can strategic risk assessment bias auditor judgment about accounting details? The Accounting Review 80 (3): 921-939. 12. Phuong Hanh, T., Samira, R. and Jean-Marc, F., 2017, Construal level theory and perceived proximity: New Study Opportunities for Retailers in an Emerging market. Doctoral thesis, Lemna-Largercia, ONIRIS, Nantes: 2. 13. Rasso, J. (2013). Psychological Distance: The Relation Between Construals, Mindsets, and Professional Skepticism. University of South Florida:5. 14. Trope, Y., and N. Liberman. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review 117 (2): 440-463. 15. Trope, Y., N. Liberman, and C. Wakslak. (2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology 17 (2): 83-95. 16. Wakslak, C., and Y. Trope. (2009). The effect of construal level on subjective probability estimates. Psychological Science 20 (1): 52-58. 17. Weisner, M.(2015). Three Studies Examining the Effects of Psychological Distance on Judgment and Decision Making in Accounting. University of Central Florida. 18. Weisner, M. M., and S. G. Sutton. (2015). When the world isn’t always flat: The impact of psychological distance on auditors’ reliance on specialists. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 16: 23. 19. White, B. J. (2014). How do fair value disclosures affect investors’ judgments of estimate uncertainty and firm value? The role of investment horizon. Working Paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract= 2224077. 20. Wiebe, J., Basil, D.Z., and Runté, M., 2016. Psychological distance and perceived consumer effectiveness in a cause-related marketing context. Int Rev Public Nonprofit Mark: 1.
|
