[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Aims& Scopes
Journal News
Articles archive::
All Issues
Current Issue
Browse by Authors
Browse by Keywords
For Authors::
Call for Papers
Submission Instruction
Submission Form
For Reviewers::
Reviewers Section
Registration::
Registration Information
Registration Form
Contact us::
Contact Information
Contact us
Site Facilities::
Site map
Search contents
FAQ
Top 10 contents
Inform to friends
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: year 11, Issue 44 (2020) ::
fa 2020, 11(44): 37-62 Back to browse issues page
The Expansion of Capital Asset Pricing Factor Models through Pricing Value ، Momentum and stock quality at Tehran stock exchange
Gholamreza Soleimanian1 , Daryush Foroghi *1 , Hadi Amiri1
1- Isfahan University
Abstract:   (4345 Views) 
Considering the inverse relationship between the value and momentum factors and the lack of simultaneous use of them in capital asset pricing models as well as non-use of stock quality as representative of profitability ans investment factors such as CAPM and Fama and French's three-factor models, the basis of this study is to provide a new functional model has been replacing pricing models of investing in stocks based on value, momentum and stock quality with market risk. For this purpose, by imposing restrictions during the period of 1387-1395, 120 companies were selected for the sample and the necessary tests were carried out. The results of the test of models and assumptions indicate the existence of convergence between the value , momentum and stock quality factors with the excess return on stocks in portfolios based on value / momentum and value / size characteristics, and these three factors lead to the risk premium in the investment Characteristic-balanced Portfolios based on Value and momentum. Also, the four-factor model of value, momentum and stock quality with market risk, has more explanatory power among competing models, and has the best performance compared to the CAPM model and the Fama and French three-factor model.
Keywords: Momentum, Value, Stock Quality, capital asset pricing Factor model
Full-Text [PDF 959 kb]   (560 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
References
1. Asness, C. and A. Frazzini (2013). The Devil in HML’s Details. Journal of Portfolio Management 39(4),49-68.
2. Asness, C., T. Moskowitz, and L. Pedersen (2013). Value and Momentum Everywhere.Journal of Finance 68(3), 929-985.
3. Asness, C., A. Frazzini, R. Israel and T. Moskowitz (2015).Fact, Fiction, and Value Investing. Journal of Portfolio Management, 42th Anniversary edition1.
4. Asness, C., A. Frazzini and L. Pedersen (2019).Quality Minus Junk. Review of Accounting Studies ,24,1.p 34-112.
5. Black, F., M. C. Jensen, and M. Scholes.(1972).The capital asset pricing model: Some empirical tests. In Studies in the theory of capital markets, ed. Michael Jensen. NewYork: Praeger 79–121.
6. Daniel, K., S. Titman. K. C. JOHN WEI (2001).Explaining the Cross-Section of Stock Returns in Japan: Factors or Characteristics?. Journal of Finance, 743–766.
7. Fama, E.F., and K.R. French (1992).The cross-section of expected stock returns. Journal of Finance 47, 427–465.
8. Fama, E.F., and K.R. French (1993). Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds. Journal of Financial Economics 33, 3- 56.
9. Fama, E.F., and K.R. French, (1995). Size and book-to-market factors in earnings and Returns. Journal of Finance 50, 131-155.
10. Fama, E.F., and K.R. French. (1996). Multifactor portfolio efficiency and multifactor asset pricing. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 31:441–65.
13. Fama, E.F., and K.R. French (2015).A Five-Factor Asset Pricing Model. Journal of financial economics 116 p.1-22.
14. Fama, E.F., and K.R. French (2016). Dissecting Anomalies with a Five-Factor Mode. The Review of Financial Studies 29 p.69-103.
15. Fama, E.F., and K.R. French (2018). Choosing Factors. Journal of financial economics 128 p.234-252.
16. Gibbons, M. & Ross, S. & Shanken, J. (1989). A Test of the Efficiency of a Given Portfolio. Econometrica, 57(5), 1121-1152.
18. Graham,B and D. Dodd(1934). Scurity Analysis.New York: McGraw hill.
19. Jegadeesh,N.,and S.Titman(1993).Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency. Journal of Finance 48, 65–91.
20. Ohlson,J.A and Bilinski.P.(2015). Risk versus Anomaly: A New Methodology Applied to Accruals. The accounting review.Vol 90.No5.pp 2057-2077
21. Sloan, R. G. (1996).Do stock prices fully reflect information in accruals and cash flows about future earnings?. Accounting Review 71:289–315
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA

XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Soleimanian G, Foroghi D, Amiri H. The Expansion of Capital Asset Pricing Factor Models through Pricing Value ، Momentum and stock quality at Tehran stock exchange. fa 2020; 11 (44) :37-62
URL: http://qfaj.mobarakeh.iau.ir/article-1-1935-en.html
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
year 11, Issue 44 (2020) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه حسابداری مالی Quarterly Financial Accounting
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.04 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4691