[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: year 12, Issue 47 (2020) ::
fa 2020, 12(47): 131-108 Back to browse issues page
Analysis of Corporates Board Relations Network with Emphasis on Financial Performance
Reza Taghizadeh *1 , Amin Rostami2 , Mohammad Abdzadeh Kanafi3 , Elaheh Karimi Zarchi4
1- Yazd University
2- Isfahan University
3- Tehran University
4- Yazd university
Abstract:   (3444 Views)
This study analyzes the board relations network of companies listed in the Tehran Stock Exchange with emphasis on financial performance from 2014 to 2020. This study uses two types of network analysis and correlation for analyzing based on the type of data collected. The research findings show that in the communication network of companies, some of them have a better position and therefore they have more access and effectiveness. Better position can lead to easier and faster access to information and resources. Also, the results of testing the hypothesis show that the more connections (degree) a company has, due to higher dispersion and lack of concentration, the financial performance is worse. The research results also show that the more access and influence (Betweenness and Closeness) a company has, the better financial performance has. As a result, it can be said that the position in the communication network affects financial performance.
Keywords: Board, Financial Performance, Network Analysis.
Full-Text [PDF 1474 kb]   (278 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
References
1. 16. Abbasi, A., Hossain, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2012). Betweenness centrality as a driver of preferential attachment in the evolution of research collaboration networks. Journal of Informetrics, 6(3), 403-412.‌
2. 17. Alqatan, A., Chbib, I., & Hussainey, K. (2019). How does board structure impact on firm performance in the UK?. Corporate Board: Role, Duties & Composition, 15(2).‌
3. 18. Batagelj, V., Mrvar, A., & De Nooy, W. (2005). Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek.‌
4. 19. Boginski, V., Butenko, S., & Pardalos, P. M. (2005). Statistical analysis of financial networks. Computational statistics & data analysis, 48(2), 431-443.‌
5. 20. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The journal of law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.‌
6. 21. García-Ramos, R., & Díaz, B. D. (2020). Board of director’s structure and firm financial performance: A qualitative comparative analysis. Long Range Planning, 102017.‌
7. 22. Hochberg, Y. V., Ljungqvist, A., & Lu, Y. (2007). Whom you know matters: Venture capital networks and investment performance. The Journal of Finance, 62(1), 251-301.‌
8. 24. Huang, W. Q., Zhuang, X. T., & Yao, S. (2009). A network analysis of the Chinese stock market. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 388(14), 2956-2964.‌
9. 25. Johnson, J. L., Daily, C. M., & Ellstrand, A. E. (1996). Boards of directors: A review and research agenda. Journal of management, 22(3), 409-438.‌
10. 26. Kyereboah-Coleman, A., & Biekpe, N. (2006). The relationship between board size, board composition, CEO duality and firm performance: Experience from Ghana. Corporate Ownership and Control, 4(2), 114-122.‌
11. 28. Larcker, D. F., So, E. C., & Wang, C. C. (2010). Boardroom centrality and stock returns. Palo Alto: Graduate School of Business, Stanford University.‌
12. 29. Mantegna, R. N. (1999). Hierarchical structure in financial markets. The European Physical Journal B-Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, 11(1), 193-197.‌
13. 30. Sankowska, A., & Siudak, D. (2016). The small world phenomenon and assortative mixing in Polish corporate board and director networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 443, 309-315.‌
14. 31. Scott, J. (2000). Social network analysis: A handbook. 2nd edn sage publications.‌
15. 32. Singh, D., & Delios, A. (2017). Corporate governance, board networks and growth in domestic and international markets: Evidence from India. Journal of World Business, 52(5), 615-627.‌
16. 33. Taghizadeh, R., Nazemi, A., and Sadeghzadeh Maharluie, M. (2019). Analyzing Shareholder Network in the Tehran Stock Exchange. Iranian Journal of Finance, 3(4), 113-134.
17. 34. Taghizadeh, R., Nazemi, A., and Sadeghzadeh Maharluie, M. (2021). Network Analysis of Interpersonal Relationships in Tehran Stock Exchange. Advances in Mathematical Finance & Applications, 6(1), 49-61.
18. 35. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications (Vol. 8). Cambridge university press.‌
20. 37. Withers, M., Kim, J. Y. R., & Howard, M. (2018). The evolution of the board interlock network following Sarbanes-Oxley. Social Networks, 52, 56-67.‌
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Taghizadeh R, Rostami A, Abdzadeh Kanafi M, Karimi Zarchi E. Analysis of Corporates Board Relations Network with Emphasis on Financial Performance. fa 2020; 12 (47) :131-108
URL: http://qfaj.mobarakeh.iau.ir/article-1-2211-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
year 12, Issue 47 (2020) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه حسابداری مالی Quarterly Financial Accounting
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4691