[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: year 13, Issue 52 (2021) ::
fa 2021, 13(52): 134-161 Back to browse issues page
Financial Transaction Tax in Tehran Stock Exchange and Size Dependent Effects on Measure of Market Quality
Parvaneh Motie1 , Ali Mazyaki2 , Hossein Panahian * 1, Hasan Ghodrati1
1- Department of Accounting, Kashan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kashan, Iran
2- Economics Department, Allameh Tabataba'i University (ATU)
Abstract:   (2486 Views)
In this study, we investigate the differentiated effect of changing Financial transaction tax on liquidity and volatility among small, medium and large companies. For this purpose, the companies admitted to the Tehran Stock Exchange are divided into three sectors based on market value, and by using the reduction in the share transfer tax rate in September 2018, the changes in trading volume, liquidity, volatility and price efficiency are evaluated and compared for three portfolios, small, medium and large using high frequency data in the period from July to November 2018.
The findings show that effects of reducing stock exchange tax on market quality measures are inversely related to the size of companies. In other words, relative to large companies, the tax reduction would further reduce the volatility of small companies and would increase the volume of transactions, liquidity and price efficiency of small companies. Therefore, it can be said that overall, the desirability of tax reduction has appeared more on small and medium-sized companies, and it seems plausible to reduce or exempt smaller companies in stock market from the financial transaction tax. This result could be very enlightening for the design of policies related to small and medium enterprises.
Article number: 6
Keywords: Financial Transaction Tax, Firm Size, Volatility, Liquidity
Full-Text [PDF 548 kb]   (88 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
References
2. Baltagi, B.H., D. Li & Q. Li. (2006). Transaction tax and stock market behavior: evidence from an emerging market. Empirical Economics, 31(2): 393-408.
3. Becchetti, L., M. Ferrari & U. Trenta. (2014). The impact of the French Tobin tax. Journal of Financial Stability, 15: 127-148.
4. Bessembinder, H., J. Hao & K. Zheng. (2020). Liquidity provision contracts and market quality: Evidence from the New York Stock Exchange. The Review of Financial Studies, 33(1): 44-74.
5. Bloomfield, R., M. O’hara & G. Saar. (2009). How noise trading affects markets: An experimental analysis. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(6): 2275-2302.
6. Capelle-Blancard, G., & O. Havrylchyk. (2016). The impact of the French securities transaction tax on market liquidity and volatility. International Review of Financial Analysis, 47: 166-178.
7. Cappelletti, G., G. Guazzarotti & P. Tommasino. (2017). The stock market effects of a securities transaction tax: quasi-experimental evidence from Italy. Journal of Financial Stability, 31: 81-92.
8. Colliard, J.E., & P. Hoffmann. (2017). Financial transaction taxes, market composition, and liquidity. The Journal of Finance, 72(6): 2685-2716.
9. Dupont, D.Y., & G.S. Lee. (2007). Effects of securities transaction taxes on depth and bid-ask spread. Economic Theory, 31(2): 393-400.
10. Eichengreen, B., J. Tobin & C. Wyplosz. (1995). Two cases for sand in the wheels of international finance. The Economic Journal, 105(428): 162-172.
11. Fong, K.Y., C.W. Holden & C.A. Trzcinka. (2017). What are the best liquidity proxies for global research?. Review of Finance, 21(4): 1355-1401
12. Gabor, D. (2016). A step too far? The European financial transactions tax on shadow banking. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(6): 925-945.
13. Galvani, V., & Ackman, M. (2021). Financial transaction tax, liquidity, and informational efficiency: Evidence from Italy. Heliyon, 7(3): e06416.
14. Garcia-Appendini, E., & J. Montoriol-Garriga. (2013). Firms as liquidity providers: Evidence from the 2007–2008 financial crisis. Journal of financial economics, 109(1): 272-291.
15. Hu, S.Y. (1998). The effects of the stock transaction tax on the stock market–experiences from Asian markets. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 6(3-4): 347-364.
16. Hull, J. (2012). Risk management and financial institutions, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
17. Huang, Y.C. (2013). Determinants of trading costs. Market microstructure in emerging and developed markets: price discovery, information flows, and transaction Costs, chapter 13: Determinants of trading costs. Wiley Online library. 231-251.
18. Jones, C.M., & P.J. Seguin. (1997). Transaction costs and price volatility: evidence from commission deregulation. The American Economic Review, 87(4): 728-737.
19. Hvozdyk, L., & S. Rustanov. (2016). The effect of financial transaction tax on market liquidity and volatility: an Italian perspective. International Review of Financial Analysis, 45: 62-78.
20. Keynes, J.M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money, New York: Harcourt Brace.
21. Kupiec, P.H. (1996). Noise traders, excess volatility, and a securities transactions tax. Journal of financial services research, 10(2): 115-129.
22. Liu, S. (2007). Securities transaction tax and market efficiency: evidence from the Japanese experience. Journal of Financial Services Research, 32(3): 161-176.
23. Liu, S. (2010). Transaction costs and market efficiency: Evidence from commission deregulation. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 50(3): 352-360.
24. Liu, S., & Z. Zhu. (2009). Transaction costs and price volatility: new evidence from the Tokyo Stock Exchange. Journal of Financial Services Research, 36(1): 65-83.
25. Madhavan, A., M. Richardson & M. Roomans. (1997). Why do security prices change? A transaction-level analysis of NYSE stocks. The Review of Financial Studies, 10(4): 1035-1064.
26. Matheson, M.T. (2011). Taxing financial transactions: Issues and evidence. IMF Working paper, WP/11/54.
27. McCulloch, N., & G. Pacillo. (2011). The Tobin tax: a review of the evidence. IDS Research Reports, 2011(68): 1-77.
28. Pomeranets, A., & D.G. Weaver. (2018). Securities Transaction Taxes and Market Quality. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 53(1): 455-484.
29. Roll, R. (1989). Price volatility, international market links, and their implications for regulatory policies. Journal of Financial Services Research, 3(2-3): 211-246.
30. Saporta, V., & K. Kan. (1997). The effects of Stamp Duty on the Level and Volatility of UK Equity Prices. Bank of England, Working Paper, No. 71.
31. Schwert, G.W., & P.J. Seguin. (1993). Securities transaction taxes: an overview of costs, benefits and unresolved questions. Financial Analysts Journal, 49(5): 27-35.
32. Sinha, P., & K. Mathur. (2014). Securities transaction tax and the stock market–an Indian experience. Finance India, 28(2): 441-452.
33. Song, F. M., & J. Zhang. (2005). Securities transaction tax and market volatility. The Economic Journal, 115(506): 1103-1120.
34. Stiglitz, J. E. (1989). Using tax policy to curb speculative short-term trading. Journal of Financial Services Research: 3(2), 101-115.
35. Subrahmanyam, A. (1998). Transaction taxes and financial market equilibrium. The Journal of Business, 71(1): 81-118.
36. Summers, L.H., & V.P. Summers. (1989). When financial markets work too well: A cautious case for a securities transactions tax. Journal of financial services research, 3(2): 261-286.
37. Tobin, J. (1978). A proposal for international monetary reform. Eastern economic journal, 4(3/4): 153-159.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Motie P, Mazyaki A, Panahian H, Ghodrati H. Financial Transaction Tax in Tehran Stock Exchange and Size Dependent Effects on Measure of Market Quality. fa 2021; 13 (52) : 6
URL: http://qfaj.mobarakeh.iau.ir/article-1-2613-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
year 13, Issue 52 (2021) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه حسابداری مالی Quarterly Financial Accounting
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4657