[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: year 14, Issue 54 (2022) ::
fa 2022, 14(54): 52-68 Back to browse issues page
Analyzing the Impact of Client Bankruptcy Risk on Auditor Conservatism
Meysam Foroughi Abari * 1, Iraj Kazemi2
1- Department of Accounting, Mobarakeh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.
2- Department of Statistics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
Abstract:   (2874 Views)
Considering the auditors' responsibility and mission in the accreditation of financial statements and the adverse effects of corporate bankruptcy on society and the users of financial statements, this study aims to investigate the auditors’ conservatism hypothesis in responding to the client bankruptcy risk by estimating the bankruptcy risk. For the purpose of this study, data of 110 companies listed on Tehran Stock Exchange during the period 1386 to 1396 are collected from audited financial statements, official website of Tehran Stock Exchange and also Iranian Association of Certified Public Accountants. In order to test the research hypotheses, this study applies the multiple regression analysis as well as probit regression. This study finds that client bankruptcy risk has a significant positive effect on the conservative behavior of the auditors, which is reflected in auditor's report in the form of going concern uncertainty. However, the results indicate that audit fees has not affected by the client bankruptcy risk. In other words, auditors consider the effect of client bankruptcy risk on the audit risk. Therefore, auditors publish conservative reports in order to carry out their legal, social and professional responsibilities and to prevent the audit failure.
 
Article number: 4
Keywords: Going Concern Opinion, Bankruptcy Risk Estimation, Audit Fees, Audit Risk, Auditor Conservatism.
Full-Text [PDF 515 kb]   (99 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
References
1. Altman, E. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis, and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. The Journal of Finance, 23(4) ,589-609
2. Basu, S. (1997). The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of accounting and economics, 24(1), 3-37.‌
3. Basu, S. )2009(. Conservatism research: Historical development and future prospects. Chinese Journal of Accounting Research, 2(1), 1–20.
4. Basu, S., Hwang, L. S., & Jan, C. L. (2002). Auditor conservatism and quarterly earnings. Available at SSRN 2428862.‌
5. Beaver, W. H., Correira, M., & McNichols, M. (2012). Do differences in financial reporting attributes impair the predictive ability of financial ratios for bankruptcy? Review of Accounting Studies, 17(4), 969–1010.
6. Bharat, S. T., & Shumway, T. (2008). Forecasting default with the Merton distance to default model. Review of Financial Studies, 21(3), 1339-1369.
7. Blay, A. D., Geiger, M. A., & North, D. S. (2011). The auditor's going-concern opinion as a communication of risk. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(2), 77-102.‌
8. Bryan, D. B., & Mason, T. W. (2017). Executive tournament incentives and audit fees. Advances in accounting, 37(3), 30-45.
9. Campbell, J. Y., Hilscher, J., & Szilagyi, J. (2008). In search of financial distress. The Journal of Finance, 63(6), 2899–2939.
10. Carson, E., Fargher, N. L., Geiger, M. A., Lennox, C. S., Raghunandan, K., & Willekens, M. (2012). Audit reporting for going-concern uncertainty: A research synthesis. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(1), 353-384.‌
11. Cenciarelli, V. G., Greco, G., & Allegrini., M. (2018). External audit and bankruptcy prediction. Journal of Management and Governance, 22(4), 863-890.
12. Correia, M., Richardson, S., & Tuna, I. (2012). Value investing in credit markets. Review of Accounting Studies, 17(3), 572–609.
13. DeFond, M. L., Raghunandan, K., & Subramanyam, K. R. (2002). Do non-audit service fees impair auditor independence? Evidence from going-concern audit opinions. Journal of Accounting Research, 40(4), 1247–1274.
14. Dhaliwal, D., Huang, S. X., Khurana, I. K., & Pereira, R. (2011). Product Market Competition and Conditional Accounting Conservatism. Working Paper, University of Arizona, University of Arkansas, and University of Missouri at Columbia.
15. Francis, J. R., & Yu, M. D. (2009). Big four office size and audit quality.The Accounting Review, 84(5), 1521–1552.
16. Greene,w. h. (2011). Econometric Analysis. 7th ed. Prentice Hall.
17. Hendriksen, E., Van Breda, S., Michael, F. (1992). Accounting Theory, 5 th Edition. Homewood. IL. Irwin. First Edition 1965.
18. Huang, Y., & Scholz, S. (2012). Evidence on the association between financial restatements and auditor resignations. Accounting Horizons, 26(3), 439–464.
19. Hribar, P., Kravet, T., & Wilson, R. (2014). A new measure of accounting quality. Review of Accounting Studies, 19(1), 506–538.
20. Kapln, S. E. & Williams D. D. (2013). Do going concern audit reports protect auditors from litigation? A simultaneous equations approach. The Accounting Review, 88(1), 192-232.
21. Kausar, A., Taffler, R. J., & Tan, C. (2009). The going‐concern market anomaly. Journal of Accounting Research, 47(1), 213-239.‌
22. Larcker, D. F., & Richardson, S. A. (2004). Fees paid to audit firms, accrual choices, and corporate governance. Journal of Accounting Research, 42(3), 625–658.
23. Lennox, C. S. & Kausar A., (2017). Estimation risk and auditor conservatism. Review of Accounting Studies, 22(1), 185-216.
24. Ohlson, J. A. (1980). Financial ratios and the probabilistic prediction of bankruptcy.Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 109-131.
25. Shirata, C. Y. (1998). Financial ratios as predictors of bankruptcy in Japan : an empirical research. Proceedings of the Second Asian Pacific Interdisciplinary Research in Accounting Conference, (pp.437-445). Tsukuba College of Technology.
26. Shumway, T. (2001). Forecasting bankruptcy more accurately: a simple hazard model. Journal of Business, 74(1), 101-124.
27. Venkataraman, R., Weber, J. P., & Willenborg, M. (2008). Litigation risk, audit quality and audit fees:evidence from initial public offerings.The Accounting Review, 83(5), 1315–1345.
28. Watts, R. L. (2003). Conservatism in accounting part II: Evidence and research opportunities. Accounting horizons, 17(4), 287-301.
29. ‌Zmijewski, M. (1984). Methodological issues related to the estimation of financial stress prediction models. Journal of Accounting Research, 22(1), 59-82.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Foroughi Abari M, kazemi I. Analyzing the Impact of Client Bankruptcy Risk on Auditor Conservatism. fa 2022; 14 (54) : 4
URL: http://qfaj.mobarakeh.iau.ir/article-1-2621-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
year 14, Issue 54 (2022) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه حسابداری مالی Quarterly Financial Accounting
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4679