The Non-linear Relation between ESG Sustainability Performance and Growth Opportunity with an emphasis on Financial Constraints

Golkhah, Mojtaba; Riahi Dorcheh, Farshid; Torabi, Iraj

[Home ] [Archive]

[ فارسی ]

Main Menu

Home

Journal Information

Articles archive

For Authors

For Reviewers

Registration

Contact us

Site Facilities

Search in website

Receive site information

year 15, Issue 59 (2023)

fa 2023, 15(59): 40-57

Back to browse issues page

The Non-linear Relation between ESG Sustainability Performance and Growth Opportunity with an emphasis on Financial Constraints

Mojtaba Golkhah¹

, Farshid Riahi Dorcheh²

, Iraj Torabi ^*

1- Department of Accounting, Ershad Damavand Institution of Higher Education, Tehran, Iran.
2- Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran.
3- Department of Accounting, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran.

Abstract: (329 Views)

The factor affecting investors' decisions is the company's growth opportunities, which factors such as environmental, social and governance (ESG) sustainability performance are effective in improving it by creating the trust of current and future shareholders. By increasing the level of ESG performance, the risk level of the shareholders will decrease and will have a negative effect on the growth opportunity. Also, in different financial conditions, managers' decisions to perform ESG performance are different. The purpose of this research is to investigate the non-linear effects of ESG sustainability performance on growth opportunities by considering financial constraints in companies listed in the Tehran Stock Exchange. The sample consists of 130 companies in the period 2014-2021. For testing hypotheses, multivariable regression model and Eviews software version 14.have been used. Research findings show that sustainability performance has an inverted U-shaped relationship with the company's growth opportunities, and the environmental dimension and corporate governance have a more important impact than the social dimension. Also, in financially constrained companies, the relationship becomes positive linear. Therefore, considering that the importance of ESG is expected to increase following the current social problems, it is suggested to design and manage ESG sustainability practices in companies. Therefore, managers should pay more attention not only to strategic features such as ESG performance, but also to its potential to enhance future growth opportunities for their companies.

Article number: 3

Keywords: ESG Sustainability Performance, Growth Opportunities, Financial Constraints.

Full-Text [PDF 586 kb] (32 Downloads)

Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special

References

1. Alareeni, B.A., & A. Hamdan. (2020). ESG impact on performance of US S&P 500-listed firms. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society 20(7): 1409-1428.

2. Andries, P., & P. Hünermund. (2020). Firm-level effects of staged investments in innovation: The moderating role of resource availability. Research Policy 49(7): 103994.

3. Avramov, D., T. Chordia, G. Jostova & A. Philipov. (2013). Anomalies and financial distress. Journal of Financial Economics 108(1): 139-159.

4. Barnett, M.L., & R.M. Salomon. (2012). Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal 33(11): 1304-1320.

5. Buallay, A. (2019). Is sustainability reporting (ESG) associated with performance? Evidence from the European banking sector. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal 30(1): 98-115.

6. Cassimon, D., P.J. Engelen & L. Van Liedekerke. (2016). When do firms invest in corporate social responsibility? A real option framework. Journal of Business Ethics 137: 15-29.

7. Chan, Y., K. Hogan, K. Schwaiger & A. Ang. (2020). ESG in Factors. The Journal of Impact and ESG Investing 1(1): 26-45.

8. Chen, Y., J.F. Weston & E.I. Altman. (1995). Financial distress and restructuring models. Financial Management 57-75.

9. Christensen, D.M., G. Serafeim & A. Sikochi. (2022). Why is corporate virtue in the eye of the beholder? The case of ESG ratings. The Accounting Review 97(1): 147-175.

10. Cuypers, I.R., P.S. Koh & H. Wang. (2016). Sincerity in corporate philanthropy, stakeholder perceptions and firm value. Organization Science 27(1): 173-188.

11. De Andrés, P., G. de la Fuente & P. Velasco. (2021). Exercising a firm’s growth options: A portfolio approach. Journal of Business Research 132: 571-585.

12. De la Fuente, G., & P. Velasco. (2022). Bank debt signalling and corporate sustainability: Does incongruence blur the message?. Finance Research Letters 46: 102288.

13. De la Fuente, G., M. Ortiz & P. Velasco. (2022). The value of a firm’s engagement in ESG practices: Are we looking at the right side?. Long Range Planning 55(4): 102143.

14. Du, X., & S. Lai. (2018). Financial distress, investment opportunity, and the contagion effect of low audit quality: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics 147: 565-593.

15. Fan, J.P., J. Huang, & N. Zhu. (2013). Institutions, ownership structures, and distress resolution in China. Journal of Corporate Finance 23: 71-87.

16. Figge, F. (2005). Value‐based environmental management. From environmental shareholder value to environmental option value. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 12(1): 19-30.

17. Fombrun, C.J., N.A. Gardberg & M.L. Barnett. (2000). Opportunity platforms and safety nets: Corporate citizenship and reputational risk. Business and Society Review 105(1).

18. Godfrey, P.C., C.B. Merrill & J.M. Hansen. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal 30(4): 425-445.

19. Graham, J.R., C.R. Harvey & S. Rajgopal. (2005). The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 40(1-3): 3-73.

20. GSIA (Global Sustainable Investment Alliance), (2018). Global sustainable investment review. Available at: http://www.gsi-alliance.org/wp-content/uploads/ 2019/03/GSIR_Review2018.3.28.pdf [last access: June 2021].

21. Haans, R.F., C. Pieters & Z.L. He. (2016). Thinking about U: Theorizing and testing U‐and inverted U‐shaped relationships in strategy research. Strategic Management Journal, 37(7): 1177-1195.

22. Hart, S.L., & M.B. Milstein. (2003). Creating sustainable value. Academy of Management Perspectives 17(2): 56-67.

23. Hartzmark, S.M., & A.B. Sussman. (2019). Do investors value sustainability? A natural experiment examining ranking and fund flows. The Journal of Finance 74(6): 2789-2837.

24. Jia, Y., X. Gao & S. Julian. (2020). Do firms use corporate social responsibility to insure against stock price risk? Evidence from a natural experiment. Strategic Management Journal 41(2): 290-307.

25. Jiang, G., & H. Wang. (2008). Should earnings thresholds be used as delisting criteria in stock market?. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 27(5): 409-419.

26. Kester, W.C. (1984). Today's options for tomorrow's growth. Harvard Business Review 62: 153-160.

27. Kim, S., G. Lee & H.G. Kang. (2021). Risk management and corporate social responsibility. Strategic Management Journal 42(1): 202-230.

28. Klingebiel, R. (2012). Options in the implementation plan of entrepreneurial initiatives: Examining firms' attainment of flexibility benefit. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 6(4): 307-334.

29. Koundouri, P., N. Pittis & A. Plataniotis. (2022). The impact of ESG performance on the financial performance of European area companies: An empirical examination. Environmental Sciences Proceedings 15(1): 13.

30. Lins, K.V., H. Servaes & A. Tamayo. (2017). Social capital, trust, and firm performance: The value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis. Journal of Finance 72(4): 1785-1824.

31. Oskouei, Z.H., & Z.H. Sureshjani. (2021). Studying the relationship between managerial ability and real earnings management in economic and financial crisis conditions. International Journal of Finance & Economics 26(3): 4574-4589.‏

32. Petersen, M.A. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: comparing approaches. The Review of Financial Studies 22(1): 435-480.

33. Porter, M.E., & M.R. Kramer. (2006). The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard business review 84(12): 78-92.

34. Saleh, N.M., & K. Ahmed. (2005). Earnings management of distressed firms during debt renegotiation. Accounting and Business Research 35(1): 69-86.

35. Shiu, Y.M., & S.L. Yang. (2017). Does engagement in corporate social responsibility provide strategic insurance‐like effects?. Strategic Management Journal 38(2): 455-470.

36. Smit, H.T., & T. Moraitis. (2010). Serial acquisition options. Long Range Planning 43(1): 85-103.

37. Trigeorgis, L., & N. Lambertides. (2014). The role of growth options in explaining stock returns. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 49(3): 749-771.

38. Trigeorgis, L., & J.J. Reuer. (2017). Real options theory in strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 38(1): 42-63.

39. Wang, H., & S.S. Lim. (2008). Real options and real value: The role of employee incentives to make specific knowledge investments. Strategic Management Journal 29(7): 701-721.

40. Wang, H., J.B. Barney & J.J. Reuer. (2003). Stimulating firm-specific investment through risk management. Long range planning 36(1): 49-59.

41. Wang, T., & B. Yang. (2023). Corporate social responsibility, stakeholders’ governance and idiosyncratic risk. Finance Research Letters 57: 104215.

Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Golkhah M, Riahi Dorcheh F, Torabi I. The Non-linear Relation between ESG Sustainability Performance and Growth Opportunity with an emphasis on Financial Constraints. fa 2023; 15 (59) : 3
URL: http://qfaj.mobarakeh.iau.ir/article-1-2688-en.html

Rights and permissions
	This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

year 15, Issue 59 (2023)

Back to browse issues page

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4657