[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: year 17, Issue 66 (2025) ::
fa 2025, 17(66): 1-18 Back to browse issues page
The Effect of Executives’ Environmental Attitudes on Firms’ Green Competitive Advantage: The Mediating Role of Environmental Management Accounting and Green Manufacturing Strategy, and the Moderating Role of Regulatory Pressure
Shokrollah Khajavi1 , Gholamreza Rezaei *2 , Samaneh Ghoohestani3
1- Faculty of Commerce and Business, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
2- Department of Accounting, Faculty of Management and Economics, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran.
3- Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics, Management and Social Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
Abstract:   (145 Views)

Environmental management accounting (EMA) has positive support for providing information for green competitive advantage. Based on upper echelons theory, this study examines the impact of upper managers' attitudes towards the environment regarding the choice of green production strategy, EMA implementation, and green competitive advantage. Also, the moderating role of regulatory pressure (RP) in some relationships is also investigated. This research is among quantitative studies. Its statistical population is all managers of agricultural and livestock companies and the number of samples was equal to 279 people. Research data was collected using a questionnaire. The partial least squares structural equation modeling method was used to test the hypotheses. The results showed that it has a significant positive and direct effect of attitude towards the environment on choosing a green production strategy and the implementation of EMA, thereby achieving a green competitive advantage. Also, the green production strategy has a positive and significant effect on the EMA and green competitive advantage in agricultural and livestock. In addition, the RP has a moderating role on the relation between the managers' attitudes towards the environment and EMA implementation. But, the RP hasn’t a moderating role on the relation between the upper managers' attitudes towards the environment and green production strategy. This study applied upper echelons theory in the management accounting field and presented the significance of the compatibility between upper managers’ attitudes towards the environment, strategies, and environmental management accounting implementation that would improve the long-term competitive advantage of the agricultural and livestock's firms.
 
Article number: 1
Keywords: Attitude towards the Environment, Green Production Strategy, Environmental Management Accounting, Regulatory Pressure.
Full-Text [PDF 687 kb]   (112 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
References
1. Abdul Rahman, A.Z., A. Meero & H. Mansur. (2020). Examining the Impact of Environmental Management Accounting on Achieving Sustainable Competitive Advantages. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal 24(6): 153-167.
2. Agarwal, R., & C.E. Helfat. (2009). Strategic renewal of organizations. Organization Science 20(2): 281–293.
3. Amir, M., & N.I. Chaudhry. (2019). Linking environmental strategy to firm performance: a sequential mediation model via environmental management accounting and top management commitment. Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences 13(4): 849–867.
4. Asiri, N., T. Khan & M. Kend. (2020). Environmental management accounting in the Middle East and North Africa region: significance of resource slack and coercive isomorphism. Journal of Cleaner Production 267: 121870.
5. Baah, C., D. Opoku-Agyeman & I.S.K. Acqah. (2021). Examining the correlations between stakeholder pressures, green production practices, firm reputation, environmental and financial performance: evidence from manufacturing SMEs. Sustainable Production and Consumption 27: 100–114.
6. Bansal, P., & K. Roth. (2000). Why companies go green: a model of ecological responsiveness. The Academy of Management Journal 43(4): 717–736.
7. Barney J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17(1): 99–120.
8. Branzei, O., P.D. Jennings & I. Vertinsky. (2002). A knowledge-based view of environmental performance in different cultural contexts: Canada, Japan, and China. Academy of Management Conference.
9. Bresciani, S., S.U. Rehman, G. Giovando & G.M. Alam. (2023). The role of environmental management accounting and environmental knowledge management practices influence on environmental performance: mediated-moderated model. Journal of Knowledge Management 27(4): 896–918.
10. Burritt, R.L., T. Hahn & S. Schaltegger. (2002). Towards a comprehensive framework for environmental management accounting—links between business actors and environmental management accounting tools. Australian Accounting Review 12(27): 39–50.
11. Cao, C., X. Tong, Y. Chen & Y. Zhang. (2022). How top management’s environmental awareness affect corporate green competitive advantage: evidence from China. Kybernetes 51(3): 1250–1279.
12. Chaudhry, N.I., & M. Amir. (2020). From institutional pressure to the sustainable development of firm: role of environmental management accounting implementation and environmental proactivity. Business Strategy and the Environment 29(8): 3542–3554.
13. Daft, R.L., & K.E. Weick. (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review 9(2): 284–295.
14. Dragomir, V.D., & V.D. Dragomir. (2020). Theoretical aspects of environmental strategy. Corporate Environmental Strategy, Theoretical Practical, and ethical Aspects 12: 1–31.
15. Dunlap, R.E., K.D. Van Liere, A.G. Mertig & R.E. Jones. (2000). New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues 56(3): 425–442.
16. Edgell, M.C.R., & D.E. Nowell. (1989). The new environmental paradigm scale: wildlife and environmental beliefs in British Columbia. Society & Natural Resources 2(1): 285–296.
17. Fernandez, E., B. Junquera & M. Ordiz. (2006). Managers’ profile in environmental strategy: a review of the literature. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 13(5): 261–274.
18. Ferreira, A., C. Moulang & B. Hendro. (2010). Environmental management accounting and innovation: an exploratory analysis. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal 23(7): 920–948.
19. Furman, A. (1998). A note on environmental concern in a developing country: results from an Istanbul survey. Environment and Behavior 30(4): 520–534.
20. Gamble J.E., M.A. Peteraf & A.A. Thompson. (2019). Essential of Strategic Management. 6th ed., USA: McGraw-Hill.
21. Gerdin, J., & J. Greve. (2004). Forms of contingency fit in management accounting research—a critical review. Accounting, Organizations and Society 29(3–4): 303–326.
22. Gooch, G.D. (1995). Environmental beliefs and attitudes in Sweden and the Baltic states. Environment and Behavior 27(4): 513–539.
23. Gunarathne, A.D.N., K. Lee & P.K. Hitigala Kaluarachchilage. (2021). Institutional pressures, environmental management strategy, and organizational performance: the role of environmental management accounting. Business Strategy and the Environment 30(2): 825–839.
24. Gunarathne, N., & K.H. Lee. (2021). Corporate cleaner production strategy development and environmental management accounting: a contingency theory perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production 308: 127402.
25. Habib, A., J. Oláh, M.H. Khan & S. Luboš. (2025). Does integration of ESG disclosure and green financing improve firm performance: Practical applications of stakeholders theory. Heliyon 11(4): 41996.
26. Hair, J.F., W.C. Black, B.J. Babin & R.E. Anderson. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis: Pearson New International Edition, Essex Pearson Educ. Ltd., 2.
27. Hambrick, D.C., & P.A. Mason. (1984). Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review 9(2): 193–206.
28. Holz, H.F. (2024). The Resource-Based View of the Firm. Reference Module in Social Sciences.
29. Huang, J.W., Y.H. Li & M.T. Yen. (2016). The relationship between green innovation and business performance-the mediating effect of Brand image. Marketing Review 13(1): 89-118.
30. Hummel, K., & C. Schlick. (2016). The relationship between sustainability performance and sustainability disclosure – Reconciling voluntary disclosure theory and legitimacy theory. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 35(5): 455-476.
31. Junior, S.S.B., D. da Silva, M.L.D. Gabriel & W.R. de Oliveira Braga. (2018). The influence of environmental concern and purchase intent in buying green products. Asian Journal of Behavioural Studies 3(12): 183-198.
32. Labodova, A. (2004). Implementing integrated management systems using a risk analysis based approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 12(6): 571–580.
33. Latan, H., C.J.C. Jabbour, A.B.L. de Sousa Jabbour, S.F. Wamba & M. Shahbaz. (2018). Effects of environmental strategy, environmental uncertainty and top management’s commitment on corporate environmental performance: the role of environmental management accounting. Journal of Cleaner Production 180: 297–306.
34. Lazaroiu, G., L. Ionescu, M. Andronie & I. Dijmarescu. (2020). Sustainability management and performance in the urban corporate economy: a systematic literature review. Sustainability 12(18): 7705.
35. Le, T.T., T.M.A. Nguyen & T.T.H. Phan. (2019). Environmental management accounting and performance efficiency in the Vietnamese construction material industry—a managerial implication for sustainable development. Sustainability 11(19): 5152.
36. Lee, C., J. Thad Barnowe & D.E. McNabb. (2005). Environmental perceptions, attitudes and priorities: cross-cultural implications for public policy. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal 12(1): 61–83.
37. Li, X., N. Wang, B. Jiang & T. Jia. (2023). Institutional pressures and proactive environmental strategy: the mediating effect of top managerial environment attitude and the moderating effect of new media pressure. Business Strategy and the Environment 32(8): 6106–6123.
38. Liem, V.T. (2021). The impact of education background on using cost management system information. Cogent Business & Management 8(1): 1944011.
39. Liem, V.T., & N.N. Hien. (2020). The impact of manager’s demographic characteristics on prospector strategy, use of management accounting systems and financial performance. International Journal of Nursing Studies 13(4): 54–69.
40. Liem, V.T., & N.N. Hien. (2024). The impact of managers’ attitudes towards environmental management accounting and green competitive advantage in Vietnam manufacturers. Heliyon 25(10): 33565.
41. Lin, Y.H., & Y.S. Chen. (2017). Determinants of green competitive advantage: the roles of green knowledge sharing, green dynamic capabilities, and green service innovation. Quality & Quantity 51: 1663–1685.
42. Malhotra, N.K., I.B. Baalbaki & N.N. Bechwati. (2007). Essentials of Marketing Research, an Applied Orientation. AU, Pearson Higher Education.
43. Mishra, P., & M. Yadav. (2021). Environmental capabilities, proactive environmental strategy and competitive advantage: a natural-resource-based view of firms operating in India. Journal of Cleaner Production 291: 125249.
44. Nakamura, M., T. Takahashi & I. Vertinsky. (2001). Why Japanese firms choose to certify: a study of managerial responses to environmental issues. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 42(1): 23–52.
45. Ogiemwonyi, O., A. Bin Harun, M.N. Alam & B.A. Othman. (2020). Do we care about going green? Measuring the effect of green environmental awareness, green product value and environmental attitude on green culture. An insight from Nigeria. Environmental and Climate Technologies 24(1): 254–274.
46. Park, E., & K.J. Kim. (2014). An integrated adoption model of mobile cloud services: exploration of key determinants and extension of technology acceptance model. Telematics and Informatics 31(3): 376–385.
47. Pierce, J.C., N.P. Lovrich Jr, T. Tsurutani & T. Abe. (1987). Environmental belief systems among Japanese and American elites and publics. Political Behavior 9: 139–159.
48. Porter, M.E. (1998). Competitive advantage Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. USA: Free Press.
49. Ritter, A.M., M. Borchardt, G.L.R. Vaccaro, G.M. Pereira & F. Almeida. (2015). Motivations for promoting the consumption of green products in an emerging country: exploring attitudes of Brazilian consumers. Journal of Cleaner Production 106: 507–520.
50. Rothaermel, F.T. (2017). Strategic Management. 3rd ed. USA: McGraw-Hill. Sari, R.N., A. Pratadina, R. Anugerah, K. Kamaliah & Z.M. Sanusi. (2021). Effect of environmental management accounting practices on organizational performance: role of process innovation as a mediating variable. Business Process Management Journal 27(4): 1296–1314.
51. Schaltegger, S., R. Burritt, D. Zvezdov, J. Horisch & J. Tingey-Holyoak. (2015). Management roles and sustainability information. Exploring corporate practice. Australian Accounting Review 25(4): 328–345.
52. Sharma, S. (2000). Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Academy of Management Journal 43(4): 681–697.
53. Shrivastava, P., & S. Hart. (1995). Creating sustainable corporations. Business Strategy and the Environment 4(3): 154–165.
54. Song, M., S. Wang & H. Zhang. (2020). Could environmental regulation and R&D tax incentives affect green product innovation? Journal of Cleaner Production 258: 120849.
55. Thorhauge, M., S. Haustein & E. Cherchi. (2016). Accounting for the Theory of Planned Behaviour in departure time choice. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 38: 94-105.
56. Van Der Poll, H.M. (2022). The barriers and drivers of environmental management accounting practices’ adoption in developed and developing countries for sustainable development. Sustainable Development 30(5): 1222–1234.
57. Wang, S., H. Wang & J. Wang. (2019). Exploring the effects of institutional pressures on the implementation of environmental management accounting: do top management support and perceived benefit work? Business Strategy and the Environment 28(1): 233–243.
58. Zameer, H., Y. Wang & H. Yasmeen. (2020). Reinforcing green competitive advantage through green production, creativity and green brand image: implications for cleaner production in China. Journal of Cleaner Production 247: 119119.
59. Sari, R.N., A. Pratadina, R. Anugerah, K. Kamaliah & Z.M. Sanusi. (2021). Effect of environmental management accounting practices on organizational performance: role of process innovation as a mediating variable. Business Process Management Journal 27(4): 1296–1314.
60. Schultz, P.W., C. Shriver, J.J. Tabanico & A.M. Khazian. (2004). Implicit connections with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24(1): 31–42.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Khajavi S, Rezaei G, Ghoohestani S. The Effect of Executives’ Environmental Attitudes on Firms’ Green Competitive Advantage: The Mediating Role of Environmental Management Accounting and Green Manufacturing Strategy, and the Moderating Role of Regulatory Pressure. fa 2025; 17 (66) : 1
URL: http://qfaj.mobarakeh.iau.ir/article-1-2852-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
year 17, Issue 66 (2025) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه حسابداری مالی Quarterly Financial Accounting
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.2 seconds with 35 queries by YEKTAWEB 4732