|
1. Almulhim, A. (2023). Effects of board characteristics on information asymmetry: Evidence from the alternative investment market. Heliyon 9(6): E16510. 2. Al-Okaily, M. (2024). The influence of digital disclosure language adoption on decrease financial information asymmetry and increase its quality. Information Discovery and Delivery 53(1): https://doi.org/10.1108/IDD-03-2024-0045. 3. Atena, F., & A. Tiron-Tudor. (2019). Gender as a dimension of inequality in accounting organizations and developmental HR strategies. Administrative Sciences 10(1): 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10010001. 4. Awwad, B., S. Binsaddig, R. Kanan & T. Al Shirawi. (2023). Women on boards: an empirical study on the effects on financial performance and corporate social responsibility. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal 33(1): 147-160. 5. Gul, F., B. Srinidhi & Tsui. J. (2008). Board diversity and the demand for higher audit effort. Available at SSRN 1359450. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1359450. 6. Hamrouni, A., M. Bouattour, N. Ben Farhat Toumi, & R. Boussaada. (2022). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and information asymmetry: does boardroom attributes matter? Journal of Applied Accounting Research 23(5): 897-920. 7. Hussain, N., U. Rigoni & R. Orij. (2018). Corporate governance and sustainability performance: Analysis of triple bottom line performance. Journal of Business Ethics 149: 411-432. 8. Lev, B. (1988). Toward a theory of equitable and efficient accounting policy. Accounting Review 63(1): 1-22. 9. Li, J., F. Zhao, S. Chen, W. Jiang, T. Liu & S. Shi. (2017). Gender diversity on boards and firms’ environmental policy. Business Strategy and the Environment 26(3): 306 315. 10. Nair, R., M. Muttakin, A. Khan., N. Subramaniam & V. Somanath. (2019). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and financial transparency: Evidence from India. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 56: 330-351. 11. Nguyen, N.T.T., N.P. Nguyen & T. Hoai. (2021). Ethical leadership, corporate social responsibility. firm reputation. and firm performance: A serial mediation model. Heliyon 7(4). 12. Orazalin, N., & M. Baydauletov. (2020). Corporate social responsibility strategy and corporate environmental and social performance: The moderating role of board gender diversity. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 27(4): 1664-1676. 13. Sahut, J., M. Peris-Ortiz & F. Teulon. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and governance. Journal of Management and Governance 23: 901-912. 14. Sandeepanie, M., P. Gamage, G. Perera & T. Sajeewani. (2023). The role of talent management and employee psychological contract on employer branding: a pragmatic conceptual model. Management Research Review 46(2): 196-222. 15. Watts, R.L., & J.L. Zimmerman. (1986). Positive accounting theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood. 16. Weick, K.E. (1969). The social psychology of organizing. Topics in social psychology. Reading Mass 22. 17. Yarram, S., & S. Adapa. (2021). Board gender diversity and corporate social responsibility: Is there a case for critical mass? Journal of Cleaner Production 278: 123-319.
|