[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: year 14, Issue 54 (2022) ::
fa 2022, 14(54): 69-84 Back to browse issues page
The difference between the Stock price synchronicity and the Idiosyncratic Risk in relation to the information environment of Iranian capital market firms
Mohammad Yaghoubi1 , Vahid Seyfi * 1, Mahdi Sadeghi shahdani1
1- Department of Economy, Imam Sadiq University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:   (2893 Views)
The present study, while stating the difference between the Stock price synchronicity and the Idiosyncratic Risk, examines the relationship between these two concepts with the firm's information environment. The research period is from 2013 to 2019. The statistical population of the study was the listed companies on the Tehran Stock Exchange that finally 131 eligible firms were selected in this study. In order to measure the Stock price synchronicity, the criterion of the regression coefficient of stock return on market return has been used, and to measure the Idiosyncratic Risk, the standard deviation of the same regression error has been used. Also, size, liquidity, leverage and Return on equity (ROE) have been used as variables of the firm's information environment. The results indicate a positive and significant relationship between both the Stock price synchronicity and the Idiosyncratic Risk with most of the criteria representing information environment that has been studied in this study. In other words, improving the information environment and increasing the information efficiency of firms leads to an increase in the Stock price synchronicity and the Idiosyncratic Risk.
Article number: 5
Keywords: Stock Price Synchronicity, Idiosyncratic Risk, Information Environment, Information Efficiency
Full-Text [PDF 541 kb]   (104 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
References
2. Amihud, Y. (2002). Illiquidity and stock returns: Cross-section and time-series effects. Journal of Financial Markets, 5, 31-56.
3. Bellver, A., & D. Kaufmann, (2005). Transparenting Transparency: Initial Empirics and Policy Applications. Policy Research Working Paper, World Bank, Washington, DC.
5. Chan, K. Hameed, A. & Kang, W. (2013). Stock price synchronicity and liquidity. Journal of Financial Markets, 16, 414-438.
6. Chan, K., & Hameed, A. (2006). Stock return synchronicity and analyst coverage in emerging markets. Journal of Financial Economics. 80 , 115–147.
8. Dasgupta, S., Gan, J., & Gao, N., (2010), Transparency, price informativeness, and stock return synchronicity: theory and evidence, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 45, 1189-1220.
11. Frankel Richard, Li Xu, (2004), Characteristics of a firm’s information environment and the information asymmetry between insiders and outsiders, Journal of Accounting and Economics 37, 229–259.
12. Gassen, J.; Skaife, H.A.; Veenman, D., (2020), Illiquidity and the Measurement of Stock Price Synchronicity, Journal of Contemporary Accounting Research 37, 419-456.
13. Glosten, L. R., and P. R. Milgrom, (1985), Bid, Ask and Transaction Prices in a Specialist Market with Heterogeneously Informed Traders, Journal of Financial Economics 14, 71–100.
14. Ho, T. S., & Michaely, R. (1988). Information quality and market efficiency. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 23, 53-70.
15. Hutton, A.P., Marcus, A.J., Tehranian, H., 2009. Opaque financial reports, R2, and crash risk. Journal of financial Economics, 94, 67–86.
18. Kelly, P. J. (2014). Information efficiency and firm-specific return variation. The Quarterly Journal of Finance, 4, 1450018.
19. King, W. R. (1988). How effective is your information systems planning? Journal of the Long Range Planning 21, 103-112.
20. Liao, C.H. (2009). Does Corporate Governanc Reduce Information Asymmetry of Intangibles? Doctoral Dissertation Case Western Reserve University, 2009.
21. Mohd, E. (2005). Accounting for Software Development Costs and Information Asymmetry, The Accounting Review, 80 , 1211-1231.
22. Morck Randall, Yeung Bernard, Yu Wayne, (2000), The information content of stock markets: why do emerging markets have synchronous stock price movements?, Journal of Financial Economics 58, 215-216.
23. Morck Randall, Yeung Bernard, Yu Wayne, (2013), R2 and the Economy, Journal of Annual Review of Financial Economics 5, 143-166.
24. Nguyen, N. H., & Truong, C. (2013). The information content of stock markets around the World: A cultural explanation. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money. 26. 1–29.
27. Weick, K. E. (2015). The Social Psychology of Organizing (first edition), Addison-Wesley Pub. Journal of Management, 18, 189-193
28. Xing, X., & Anderson, R. (2011). Stock price synchronicity and public firm-specific information. Journal of Financial Markets. 14 , 259–276.
29. Fraz, A., & H. Arshad. (2016). Stock Price Synchronicity and Information Environment, Journal of Business & Economic Review 9: 213-232.
30. Fu, J., X. Chen, Y. Liu, R. Chen. (2021). Managerial ability and stock price synchronicity, Journal of Research in International Business and Finance 60: 101606- 101620.
31. Haga, J., K. Högholm, D. Sundvik. (2022). Peer firms’ reporting frequency and stock price synchronicity: European evidence, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 49: 100505-100520.
33. Li, B., S. Rajgopal, M. Venkatachalam. (2012). R2 and Idiosyncratic Risk are not Inter-Changeable, Journal of the Accounting Review 89: 2261-2295.
34. Li, Q., X. Liu, J. Chen & H. Wang. (2022). Does stock market liberalization reduce stock price synchronicity? —Evidence from the Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect, Journal of International Review of Economics & Finance 77: 25-38.
35. Sebenius, J.K., & J. Geanakoplos. (1983). Don't Bet on it: Contingent Agreements with Asymmetric Information, Journal of the American Statistical Association 78: 424-426.
36. Von Koch, C., & M. Willesson. (2020). Firms' information environment measures: a literature review with focus on causality. Journal of Managerial Finance 46: 4327-4358.
37. Zhang, W., X. Li, D. Shen & A. Teglio. (2016). R2 and idiosyncratic volatility: Which captures the firm-specific return variation?. Journal of Economic Modelling 55: 298- 304.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Yaghoubi M, Seyfi V, Sadeghi shahdani M. The difference between the Stock price synchronicity and the Idiosyncratic Risk in relation to the information environment of Iranian capital market firms. fa 2022; 14 (54) : 5
URL: http://qfaj.mobarakeh.iau.ir/article-1-2440-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
year 14, Issue 54 (2022) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه حسابداری مالی Quarterly Financial Accounting
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.04 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4679