[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Aims& Scopes
Journal News
Articles archive::
All Issues
Current Issue
Browse by Authors
Browse by Keywords
For Authors::
Call for Papers
Submission Instruction
Submission Form
For Reviewers::
Reviewers Section
Registration::
Registration Information
Registration Form
Contact us::
Contact Information
Contact us
Site Facilities::
Site map
Search contents
FAQ
Top 10 contents
Inform to friends
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: year 17, Issue 68 (2026) ::
fa 2026, 17(68): 49-67 Back to browse issues page
Developing a Comprehensive Model for Measuring Audit Quality with an Implementation-Oriented Approach from Users’ Perspectives
Hamidreza Rezaei1 , Mahdi Moradi *1 , Mohammad Ali Bagharpour Valashani2 , Mehdi Jabbari Nooghabi3
1- Department of Accounting, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Iran.
2- Department of Accounting, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
3- Department of Statistics, Faculty of Mathematical Sciences, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Iran.
Abstract:   (12 Views)
Due to the existence of diverse definitions and perspectives regarding audit quality, various criteria have been employed to measure it. However, most of the commonly used measures capture only a single dimension of audit quality, which may lead to misinterpretation by users. This study aims to conceptualize audit quality and to develop a comprehensive model for measuring audit quality from the perspective of users. To achieve the research objectives and develop the proposed model, a questionnaire was distributed among 329 respondents in 1403 (2024), including certified public accountants, financial managers, investors, and bank credit managers. Confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling were employed for statistical analysis using SPSS, R, and AMOS software packages. The findings resulted in the development of a comprehensive model for measuring audit quality from the perspectives of certified public accountants, financial managers, investors, and bank credit officers, both collectively and separately for each group. The proposed comprehensive model encompasses the entire audit process—from the demand for audit services to the issuance of the audit report—and categorizes audit quality indicators into four groups: client firm characteristics, audit firm characteristics, audit process indicators, and audit report indicators. It should be noted that, from the respondents’ perspectives, none of the criteria within these four categories can independently represent audit quality. Rather, all criteria across the various dimensions must be considered collectively in order to adequately assess audit quality .
Article number: 3
Keywords: Audit Quality, Client Firm Characteristics, Audit Firm Characteristics, Audit.
Full-Text [PDF 1486 kb]   (25 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
References
1. Ahamed, I., & R. Jaffar. (2022). Board size and audit quality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Corporate Governance 30(4): 405-423.
2. Al-Qatamin, Z., & S. Salleh. (2020). Audit quality: A literature overview and research synthesis. Journal of Business and Management 22(2): 56-66.
3. Azizkhani, M., R. Daghani & G. Shailer. (2018). Audit Firm Tenure and Audit Quality in a Constrained Market. The International Journal of Accounting 53(3): 167-182.
4. Brown, M. (2024). Audit Quality and Financial Decision Making: A Global Perspective. International Journal of Auditing 38(1): 59-75.
5. Carcello, J.V., & A.L. Nagy. (2021). Audit Quality and Internal Controls: An Integrated Perspective. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 40(2): 75-92.
6. Chen, H., J. Cheng, & S. Wang. (2021). Legal Proceedings and Audit Quality: The Impact of Litigation Risk on Auditor Behavior. Accounting Review 96(4): 112-141.
7. Chen, L. (2020). The impact of audit firm size on audit quality. Journal of Accounting Research 58(2): 367-389.
8. Choi, J., & Y. Kim. (2020). Board diversity and audit quality: Evidence from the United States. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 39(5): 106737.
10. DeAngelo, L. (1981). Auditor Size and Audit Quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics 3(3): 183-199.
11. DeAngelo, L.E. (2020). The Effect of Litigation Risk on Audit Quality: Evidence from Legal Proceedings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 70(3): 345-378.
12. DeAngelo, L.E., & J. Stedman. (2021). The Role of Auditor Experience in Enhancing Audit Quality. Accounting Review 96(2): 93-115.
13. DeFond, M., & J. Zhang. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics 58(2–3): 275–326.
14. Fearnley, S., & V. Beattie. (2020). Audit Quality in a Changing Financial Landscape. Journal of Auditing and Assurance 44(2): 58-74.
15. Francis, J.R., & D. Wang. (2022). Audit Quality and Public Trust: The Importance of Transparency. Accounting Horizons 36(4): 511-530.
16. Givoly, D., & C. Hayn. (2020). The complexity of audit and its impact on financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 70(2): 263-280.
17. Gul, F.A., & J.S. Tsui. (2020). First-time Audits and Audit Quality: Evidence from Emerging Markets. Journal of Accounting Research 58(4): 87-112.
18. Hayes, R., T. Schaefer & M. McCracken. (2022). Risk and demand for audit quality in financial distress situations. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 57(6): 2365-2385.
19. Kang, Y., J. Lee & J. Choi. (2020). Board independence and audit quality: Evidence from Korea. Journal of International Accounting Research 19(1): 67-80.
20. Knechel, W.R., A. Vanstraelen & M. Zerni. (2020). Audit quality: Insights from the global financial crisis and beyond. Accounting and Business Research 50(5): 550-576.
21. Krishnan, J., & P.C. Schauer. (2000). The differentiation of quality among auditors: Evidence from the not-for-profit sector. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 19(2): 9-25.
22. Krogstad, M.F., & D. Lonsdale. (2019). The Impact of Increased Audit Report Disclosures on Audit Quality. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 38(3): 278-295.
23. Kwon, S.Y., S.H. Lee, & C.S. Lee. (2021). The role of audit committees in enhancing audit quality: Evidence from Korea. Journal of Applied Business Research 37(4): 87-99.
24. Lee, T.H., & W.S. Hwang. (2020). The Effect of Clarity in Audit Reporting on Audit Quality. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 39(4): 106728.
25. Lennox, C., & J.Sh. Wu. (2022). A review of China-related accounting research in the past 25 years. Journal of Accounting and Economics 74(2-3) .
26. Liu, Y., & Z. Zhang. (2022). The role of auditor reputation in the quality of audit services. International Journal of Auditing 26(1): 72-89.
27. Michaelsen, M., R. Schreiber & L. Weber. (2020). The Impact of Auditing Standards on Audit Quality. Journal of Accounting Research 58(2): 233-255.
28. Nam, S., & J. Ronen. (2014). The Impact of Non Audit Services on Capital Markets. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 27: 32-60.
29. Singh, S.K., S. Gupta, D. Busso & S. Kamboj. (2021). Top management knowledge value, knowledge sharing practices, open innovation and organizational performance. Journal of Business Research 128: 788-798.
30. Smith, J., & A. Jones. (2024). The Impact of Audit Quality on Financial Transparency. Journal of Accounting 42(3): 125-140.
31. White, L., & P. Green. (2024). Audit Quality and Investor Confidence: A Study on Global Markets. Accounting Research Review 50(2): 210-225.
32. Yip, R., & H. Lee. (2021). Regulatory frameworks and audit quality: Evidence from the United States and Europe. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 40(5): 103-118.
33. Zhang, L., & X. Yang. (2021). Board expertise and audit quality: The moderating role of audit committee characteristics. Journal of Corporate Finance 68: 101962.
34. Zhang, L., & X. Zhang. (2020). The Impact of Tax Disputes on Audit Quality. Accounting & Finance 60(5): 2731-2752.
35. Zhang, S., & C. Ma. (2019). The Effect of Legal Disclosures in Audit Reports on Audit Quality. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 34(3): 453-472.
36. Zhang, Y., & Q. Li. (2024). Challenges and Improvements in Audit Quality: A Global Perspective. Journal of Financial Auditing 58(1): 92-110.
37. Zuo, L., & J. Li. (2020). The Impact of Detailed Audit Report Disclosures on Audit Quality. Accounting & Finance 60(3): 2891-2910.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA

XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rezaei H, Moradi M, Bagharpour Valashani M A, Jabbari Nooghabi M. Developing a Comprehensive Model for Measuring Audit Quality with an Implementation-Oriented Approach from Users’ Perspectives. fa 2026; 17 (68) : 3
URL: http://qfaj.mobarakeh.iau.ir/article-1-2914-en.html
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
year 17, Issue 68 (2026) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه حسابداری مالی Quarterly Financial Accounting
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.16 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4732